CVVH (continuous venovenous hemodialysis) is the form of CRRT (continuous renal replacement therapy) used in our hospital. Although most studies have not shown a mortality benefit in patients treated with intermittent hemodialysis versus those treated with CVVH, in my opinion there is a subset of patients--I'm talking the sickest of the sick, often patients on multiple pressors, sometimes those who are s/p major cardiac surgery on balloon pumps and/or ventricular assist devices--who require CVVH in order to achieve adequate volume removal.
At our hospital, there are two main types of CVVH replacement solution that we use: bicarbonate-based and citrate-based. Both provide adequate base, as citrate is metabolized to bicarbonate in the liver. Citrate provides superior anticoagulation to bicarbonate alone; it's also advantageous in that it provides extracorporeal anticoagulation while avoiding systemic anticoagulation, as the Ca gluconate drip which is administered simultaneously to the blood as it re-enters the body binds to and neutralizes the citrate. Bicarbonate can be given with heparin but obviously this comes with some cost of internal bleeding. If a patient is already on heparin for something (e.g. MI, valve replacement) I would generally choose bicarbonate. Citrate-based replacement solution should be avoided in patients with severe liver failure or an anion gap metabolic acidosis; these problems predispose to citrate toxicity, which is reflected as an elevated total calcium but a decreased ionized calcium with a subsequent anion gap.
At our hospital, there are two main types of CVVH replacement solution that we use: bicarbonate-based and citrate-based. Both provide adequate base, as citrate is metabolized to bicarbonate in the liver. Citrate provides superior anticoagulation to bicarbonate alone; it's also advantageous in that it provides extracorporeal anticoagulation while avoiding systemic anticoagulation, as the Ca gluconate drip which is administered simultaneously to the blood as it re-enters the body binds to and neutralizes the citrate. Bicarbonate can be given with heparin but obviously this comes with some cost of internal bleeding. If a patient is already on heparin for something (e.g. MI, valve replacement) I would generally choose bicarbonate. Citrate-based replacement solution should be avoided in patients with severe liver failure or an anion gap metabolic acidosis; these problems predispose to citrate toxicity, which is reflected as an elevated total calcium but a decreased ionized calcium with a subsequent anion gap.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Renal Fellow Network encourages comments and discussion regarding the posts. Do not post any comments that are commercial or advertising in nature. Posts will be deleted if commercial or advertising comments are made. Internet users commenting on the Renal Fellow Network must post information which is true and correct to their knowledge. Sources to health/medical claims must be provided when relevant. Moderators reserve the right to erase, without notification, any comment they would judge inappropriate.