If you've never heard the biochemical sleuthwork involved in the legal case of Patricia Stallings, it's definitely worth reading about: a good summary of the case can be found here.
Briefly, it involves a St. Louis-area woman who, in 1989, was sentenced to jail for the alleged poisoning of her baby son after he was hospitalized twice, and eventually died, due to apparent ethylene glycol toxicity. The diagnosis was made due to the presence of characteristic lab abnormalities (anion gap, osmolar gap), crystals deposits in the brain (felt to be oxalate crystals) as well as the documented presence of ethylene glycol--though the lab test used was apparently an older and less reliable gas chromatography method of measuring ethylene glycol in retrospect.
Fast forward several months later, when Patricia Stallings gave birth to a second child while in prison--who developed a similar illness and was diagnosed with a rare autosomal recessive error of metabolism: methylmalonic aciduria (MMA), which causes a chronic metabolic acidosis. The same type of disorder can also occur with severe vitamin B12 deficiency. Geneticists at St. Louis University and Yale University, alerted to the possibility that the first child's death might have been due to this genetic disease rather than ethylene glycol poisoning, re-examined the older blood samples, which were still available. They found that the original samples DID have an abundance of methylmalonic acid, and with a more accurate lab test did not have ethylene glycol. Patricia Stallings was determined to be innocent and subsequently released.
The legal aspects of the case, as it turns out, are just as interesting as the medical aspects: it involves the prosecuting attorney for the case actually initiating much of the detective work after the conviction which helped prove Stallings' innocence.
Monday, June 15, 2009
3 comments:
Renal Fellow Network encourages comments and discussion regarding the posts. Do not post any comments that are commercial or advertising in nature. Posts will be deleted if commercial or advertising comments are made. Internet users commenting on the Renal Fellow Network must post information which is true and correct to their knowledge. Sources to health/medical claims must be provided when relevant. Moderators reserve the right to erase, without notification, any comment they would judge inappropriate.
This is a really well done and informative blog. Thanks for doing it.
ReplyDeleteThanks!!
ReplyDeleteGood article. I have also reviewed the Sallings case
ReplyDelete