There are two general strategies for CVVH replacement solution entering into the blood circuit: pre-dilution (in which replacement solution is mixed with the blood prior to its entry into the filter), or post-dilution (in which replacement solution is mixed with the blood after it has passed through the filter). Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. Where I have trained, we always use the pre-dilution method. The theoretical advantage here is that because the blood is diluted prior to entry into the filter, there is a lower risk of clotting the filter, allowing for longer filter life and reduced down-time for the CVVH machine. We often claim that CVVH is a continuous therapy, but due to technical issues it is not uncommon for the therapy to be halted for several hours out of a day; pre-dilution technique may help minimize this. Furthermore, pre-dilution allows for near-limitless ultrafiltration rates, essential when rapid volume removal is necessary. The main cited drawback of the pre-dilution method is that much of the fluid passing through the filter is actually replacement fluid--thereby leading to a reduced efficiency of about 10-15% in clearance when compared to tost post-dilutional method, in which all the fluid moving through the filter is the patient's. Generally this is not a problem given that this is a near-continuous therapy, but proponents of the post-dilution method claim improved efficiency as an advantage. It is important to specify pre- versus post- dilution methods in the interpretation of various publications in CVVH.
Friday, August 21, 2009
pre-dilutional versus post-dilutional CVVH
There are two general strategies for CVVH replacement solution entering into the blood circuit: pre-dilution (in which replacement solution is mixed with the blood prior to its entry into the filter), or post-dilution (in which replacement solution is mixed with the blood after it has passed through the filter). Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. Where I have trained, we always use the pre-dilution method. The theoretical advantage here is that because the blood is diluted prior to entry into the filter, there is a lower risk of clotting the filter, allowing for longer filter life and reduced down-time for the CVVH machine. We often claim that CVVH is a continuous therapy, but due to technical issues it is not uncommon for the therapy to be halted for several hours out of a day; pre-dilution technique may help minimize this. Furthermore, pre-dilution allows for near-limitless ultrafiltration rates, essential when rapid volume removal is necessary. The main cited drawback of the pre-dilution method is that much of the fluid passing through the filter is actually replacement fluid--thereby leading to a reduced efficiency of about 10-15% in clearance when compared to tost post-dilutional method, in which all the fluid moving through the filter is the patient's. Generally this is not a problem given that this is a near-continuous therapy, but proponents of the post-dilution method claim improved efficiency as an advantage. It is important to specify pre- versus post- dilution methods in the interpretation of various publications in CVVH.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Renal Fellow Network encourages comments and discussion regarding the posts. Do not post any comments that are commercial or advertising in nature. Posts will be deleted if commercial or advertising comments are made. Internet users commenting on the Renal Fellow Network must post information which is true and correct to their knowledge. Sources to health/medical claims must be provided when relevant. Moderators reserve the right to erase, without notification, any comment they would judge inappropriate.