There seemed to be general agreement that volume expansion with isotonic saline is definitely effective, and many individuals also selected the isotonic saline + N-acetylcysteine combination. Interestingly, only 23% advocated using a sodium bicarbonate-based regimen (6% iv bicarb alone + 17% iv bicarb + oral NAC) despite its superiority as demonstrated in the oft-cited 2004 JAMA paper in which patients were randomized to receive either an iv bicarbonate or an iv saline regimen, and this recent 2009 AJKD meta-analysis of trials involving sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast nephropathy. However it is essential to point out that this remains a controversial topic, and hopefully further RCTs will clarify the issue.
Thursday, October 22, 2009
There are bicarbonate doubters amongst you...
Final results of last week's Renal Fellow Network poll:
2 comments:
Renal Fellow Network encourages comments and discussion regarding the posts. Do not post any comments that are commercial or advertising in nature. Posts will be deleted if commercial or advertising comments are made. Internet users commenting on the Renal Fellow Network must post information which is true and correct to their knowledge. Sources to health/medical claims must be provided when relevant. Moderators reserve the right to erase, without notification, any comment they would judge inappropriate.
Our local nephrologists do saline + IV NAC. Is this not available in your neck of the woods?
ReplyDeleteI think the data showing that there is no difference between saline and bicarb is just as compelling...see a recent meta-analysis in cJASN.
ReplyDelete(http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/CJN.03120509v1)