Recent work has implicated bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS or endotoxin), a glycolipid found in the outer membrane of gram negative bacteria, in this process. (The potency of LPS as a pro-inflammatory stimulus is detailed in this extraordinary case report from the NEJM archive)
Previous work in patients with congestive cardiac failure (reviewed here) has demonstrated that relative underperfusion of the gut results in leakage of LPS from the GI tract into the circulation. A group of UK investigators analogised this situation to the haemodynamic perturbations seen in haemodialysis sessions and used this as a starting point to investigate the concentration of circulating LPS in CKD patients.
They found that endotoxemia (i.e. circulating LPS concentrations) :
- tended to increase with worsening CKD stage
- showed a 6-fold increase in patients on dialysis
- tripled at the initiation of dialysis
So should we be giving our most haemodynamically unstable dialysis patients antibiotic treatment, or selective gram negative gut decontamination or polymyxin B haemadsorption instead of dialysis? Well, my thought is that individually tailored dialysis prescriptions to reduce CV stress during dialysis sessions are likely to be a good start in reducing LPS translocation and potentially decreasing the sequelae of this. I also note that the same group have just published a paper suggesting that plain (and good) old aggressive anti-hypertensive therapy might be a good option too.
How do we reconcile the fact that most bactetemia r the gram positive type in hd pt...mssa...even the ones that doesn't have a catheter
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment
ReplyDeleteThere is some disagreement in the literature about whether it is whole bacterial organisms or just LPS that is translocated from the gut in heart failure and dialysis (summarised in this review).
I personally doubt that one would see a statistical enrichment of gram -ve bacteraemia in the patients described in the study