This month's nephrology web episode from Washington University in St. Louis focuses on 4 board-style questions related to potassium disorders, and we hope you find it helpful. The full episode can be viewed below:
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Potassium Board Review - New Wash U Nephrology Web Episode
This month's nephrology web episode from Washington University in St. Louis focuses on 4 board-style questions related to potassium disorders, and we hope you find it helpful. The full episode can be viewed below:
2 comments:
Renal Fellow Network encourages comments and discussion regarding the posts. Do not post any comments that are commercial or advertising in nature. Posts will be deleted if commercial or advertising comments are made. Internet users commenting on the Renal Fellow Network must post information which is true and correct to their knowledge. Sources to health/medical claims must be provided when relevant. Moderators reserve the right to erase, without notification, any comment they would judge inappropriate.
Nice post. I have 2 comments. Firstly, with regards to the mechanism of hypocalciuria associated with thiazide diuretics, recent data indicates that is actually the proximal tubule (not the distal tubule) that is responsible for this. Apparently, the volume contraction state associated with thiazide use increases calcium reabsorption in the proximal tubule.(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15902302). Secondly, TTKG should not be used anymore to provide a semi-quantitative reflection of the driving force to secrete K+ in the CCD. Halperin group developed this parameter with the assumption that there is no significant reabsorption of osmoles beyond the CCD. However, with the discovery of significant urea recycling in the medullary CD, TTKG loses its value.(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=21788894)
ReplyDeleteThanks for your response - I agree with both of your comments. The hypocalciuria in thiazides has always been tough for me to rationalize to fellows and is likely a combination of both mechanisms. Likewise I agree with your point on TTKG, but inevitably it gets ordered for academic purposes and despite not being that helpful clinically, it does make for a nice discussion on it's historic value and physiologic principle.
ReplyDelete