data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/472b6/472b621fb10393809140a12764e226a72900d411" alt=""
However, there is some danger in biopsy: many of these patients have a difficult time with wound healing, and it would be preferable to have a non-invasive manner by which to support the diagnosis of calciphylaxis. A 2002 KI article by Fine and Zacharias provides evidence that a bone scan is fairly sensitive for this diagnosis and could be used in lieu of a biopsy. Their analysis indicated that 34 out of 36 patients with a diagnosis of calciphylaxis had an abnormal bone scan--most commonly reflected as showing increased uptake in the calves, typically in the areas of pain/ulceration (as shown on the left). Of note, this particular study does not really address how specific a bone scan is at excluding alternative causes of this type of dermopathy, but could still potentially be useful in the right clinical setting. Unfortunately, calciphylaxis still carries with it a very high mortality rate.
1 comment:
What would you do to treat calciphylaxis? I'm curious. Have tried CVVH on a couple of patients but results dismal. Perhaps intervened too little too late.
Post a Comment