data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9591/a95915ede0bc691f8c2deb7ea5a11e13a57218fd" alt=""
To review, the simplistic take on the classification scheme is the following (I'm ignoring many of the existing subdivisions):
WHO Class I: minimal mesangial lupus nephritis
WHO Class II: mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis
WHO Class III: focal proliferative lupus nephritis (<50%>50% of glomeruli involved)
WHO Class V: membranous lupus nephritis
WHO Class VI: advanced sclerotic lupus nephritis (e.g., too much fibrosis to tell)
One of the main additions to this classification scheme was the subdivision into WHO Class IV into SEGMENTAL (Class IV-S) and GLOBAL (Class IV-G), based on whether there is less than 50% capillary tuft involvement (IV-S) versus more than 50% capillary tuft involvement (IV-G). Several researchers had found that there was a slightly improved prognosis in the IV-G group compared to the IV-S group which might justify such a division; however, this difference has not been reproducibly demonstrated in follow-up studies. Thus, whether or not there really are distinct subpopulations of IV-G and IV-S individuals with different prognoses remains controversial.
No comments:
Post a Comment