government policies and extended criteria for donor organs have a role to play in solving this problem, it has always seemed to me that science is going to have to serve us up a definitive solution.
Although many of us appreciate that induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) will likely form part of the answer to this question, it is more difficult to visualise how iPSCs could be used to reconstitute a complex multi-cell organ such as the kidney. Additionally, since the emergence of 3D printing we have had media friendly stories of printed kidneys without much information about what will be used as the 'ink' in the printer.
A paper in this month's Cell Stem Cell may hint at the future. Firstly, the authors worked out the developmental origins of the metanephric mesenchyme (MM), the embryonic tissue that generates most elements of a functioning kidney (see diagram). The group then used this information to derive MM from PSCs and found that this derived MM successfully reconstituted glomeruli and proximal and distal tubules in vitro. Furthermore, when these generated nephrons were transplanted beneath the renal capsule of mice they showed new vascularisation suggesting they may be functional.
So, is the answer to our transplantation problem to use these authors' protocol to derive lots of MM which can then be 3D printed around a small core of functioning renal tissue to make a working organ? Well, a number of issues remain. Firstly, as can be seen from the diagram, the collecting duct is derived from the separate ureteric bud. Therefore, it is not included in this model and successful combination of these structures would likely be needed to make a truly functional nephron. Perhaps most glaring is that the Cell Stem Cell paper makes no assessment of the excretory function of these derived nephrons.
In conclusion this is probably only "a good start" but I think it represents significantly more progress than any number of eye catching 3D printer stories.