The DCOR Trial was a Genzyme-funded randomized control trial--somebody recently told me the largest ever conducted in a dialysis population--designed to compare the phosphate binder sevelamer (Renagel) with Ca-containing phosphate binders (calcium acetate a.k.a. Phoslo or calcium carbonate). The theory behind the trial is that since cardiovascular disease is the #1 killer of ESRD patients, and since vascular calcifications are hypothesized to cause accelerated atherosclersosis, then a non-calcium-containing phosphorus binder such as sevelamer would be expected to not contribute as much to vascular calcifications and cardiovascular disease.
Sounds good, but the primary end-point of mortality was identical in the two groups. In "sub-group analysis", there was allegedly a trend towards benefit in the sevelamer group in those >65 years of age or those who had been taking the medication for >2 years, but overall there seems to be a consensus that this represents a negative trial.
In related news, sevelamer costs significantly more than calcium acetate (and certainly more than calcium carbonate for that matter). You make the call as to which phosphate binder is better for your patients...
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment